Looking to the Future for UFO Research and Investigation
Photograph is copyright to Bill Rose
It is the destiny of man to stand
always between the certainty of his scientific achievements and the annoying
evidence that they do not account for all there is. Other forces manifest. We are quick to give them convenient names
and familiar roles. We call them ghosts,
spirits, extraterrestrials. When all
else fails we abjectly turn them into Gods, the better to worship what we fail
to grasp, the better to idolize what we are too lazy to analyze…Dr. Jacques
Vallee from his book ‘Forbidden Science’
It has been a while, since I updated
readers on the state of play for UFO sightings that BUFORA have been receiving,
so I suggest we start with 2015 and possibly look to where we are heading in
understanding the many theories and unsubstantiated rumours that can be rife in the world of
ufology. In the midst of all of this there
are a core of unexplained phenomena, but after many years involved with this
fascinating and sometimes crazy subject, it is my opinion and experience that all
is not as it seems. This is not to imply
that there are not mysteries and curiosities in life. Indeed there are and this is the driving
force, I suspect, for us all in our continued search and exploration.
As has been addressed before, the UFO
field of research is made up of several components, the investigators and
researchers, the people who report sightings and high strangeness events, the
UFO literature, the media, television programmes and the very ‘human face’ of
ufology, perception, memory and the huge influence of beliefs in the idea of an
extraterrestrial presence.
This year has seen an increase of
sightings to BUFORA, particularly with visual images and video footage. Images now comprise a high percentage of
sighting reports as more and more sophisticated smart phones capture all manner
of odd lights and objects. BUFORA’s
imaging specialists have been very busy over the last few years, and
particularly 2015, giving definitive and probable evaluations for these images.
It is also the case that a percentage
of the public sending these images to BUFORA did not actually observe anything
when taking their photographs, but only noticed something ‘odd’ when they
uploaded the photographs to their computer.
There can be many reasons for this including optical effects, something
close to the camera lens such as insects, or actually on the camera lens, birds
that were not noticed while taking the photograph and various other
explanations. It is also the case that
when some members of the public capture photographs that they believe to be
‘not of this earth’ no amount of rational explanations will be acceptable, so
it can be disheartening at times for
those in BUFORA conducting analyses when they are challenged, as a
percentage of witnesses want their beliefs to be validated.
To balance the scales, there are
those presenting their photographs and sighting report forms, who are very
happy to have an explanation for the lights and objects they have captured on
camera and this will enrich their understanding of the many problems with
photographs and video footage and that all is not as it sometimes appears on
camera and that although the camera does not lie by definition, photographs
can include some, what appear to be,
very strange anomalies, which actually are not unusual at all when evaluated by
visual specialists with all supporting
information.
It is also the case, and often not
understood very well, that a photograph cannot be evaluated without FULL
supporting information which can be given by completing the BUFORA online
Sighting Report Form. This gives an
investigator and imaging specialist a complete understanding of the various
facets contained in the image. Without
this BUFORA does not assess any images as they cannot give an accurate
evaluation.
There have been a couple of very
interesting images and footage captured in the last year, one of which was taken
from an aircraft. BUFORA have been
awaiting permission from the photographer in order to show a clip from the footage
and images on the website. However,
sadly this has not been forthcoming so the footage and Dave Newton’s excellent and
very unusual and rare evaluation cannot be used on the site without permission
and we always adhere strictly to the directives of BUFORA’s Code of Practice.
I would also like to take this
opportunity on behalf of the BUFORA NIC, to extend huge thanks and appreciation
to Mark Easen, Dave Newton and Peter Wooton for all their time and work in
evaluating images for BUFORA. They can
spend many hours analysing some images and as BUFORA is a voluntary
organisation it can take some time for photographs to be assessed.
BUFORA use robust investigative
methods to follow up sighting/visual reports which are why it is mandatory for
BUFORA investigators/researchers to enroll on the Investigators Training Course
(ITC) in order to gain a realistic understanding of the high number of lights
and objects in the sky that can be misidentified. Without rigorous
investigative methods, our understanding of unidentified sighting reports will
not be enhanced one iota, which is why the quote from Dr Jacques Vallee is so
relevant then and now and why Dr Vallee’s research and exploration of the UFO
subject has contributed in such an important and coherent way into how we understand
the reality of the UFO subject.
Investigators
Training Course and Sighting Reports
Photograph is copyright to Bill Rose
There are several candidates enrolled
on the BUFORA training course doing very well.
Mark Walsh has now completed the Examination Module which is awaiting
marking. He has achieved a high standard
of results for Modules 1-6 and will be a welcome addition to the NIC (National
Investigations Committee). Tony Eccles
and Mark Easen are also tutoring several candidates on the ITC .
Unfortunately there is a pattern of
some candidates dropping off the course midway, as other commitments take
priority or they lose interest when they understand the ITC is fundamental
training in what can be observed and misidentified in the sky. There is a lengthy list of lights and objects
in our sky that can be misinterpreted under different circumstances including angles
of viewing, atmospheric distortions, optical effects, inaccurate night-time estimations
of distance and height. All of these can lead the observer to inaccuracy in how
they report something in the sky that they feel is unidentified. There are many factors involved in how we
view something in the sky that can look strange. Of course witness’ beliefs
sometimes play a role in how they understand the object or lights they are
viewing. Therefore it is crucial for
those on the ITC to learn the basic foundation of robust investigation methods
and to understand that there can sometimes be very inaccurate information on
the internet in relation to UFO sightings, sometimes with unreliable
investigative methodology and in some cases very limited research. The percentage of sightings and visual images
captured which remain unexplained are far rarer than one would assume when
navigating the UFO links on the internet and documentaries covering the UFO
subject.
The very human factor of what we
believe, and how we use narratives from the internet, television and media to
reinforce those beliefs, most certainly applies with regard to a belief
in extraterrestrial visitation. We have
all kinds of hopes and beliefs and because we are human we will use anything we
can to back up those beliefs, whether religious, political or any number of
things. This is part of what it means to
be human.
Photograph is copyright to Bill Rose
Now to move on to sightings,
photographs and footage received by BUFORA this year, there has been an
increase in reports so far in 2015, at least 80% of them being visual images,
particularly during the summer months as people are out and about during the
light nights and taking vacations in various parts of the UK, all with their
camera phones in tow. BUFORA have been
receiving many reports and enquiries so it has been a busy time. High strangeness reports have increased a
little too, as people interpret various experiences as being due an
extraterrestrial presence. Of course
there are problems here with many factors at work to convince them that their
experience may have been alien in nature, particularly with regard to the
particular triggers that make them seek out a UFO organisation as being the
agency to which they want to report an experience that they feel to be up close
and personal encounters with something from ‘out there’. There are many possibilities for the nature
of these experiences as related in the BUFORA article on our website: Hypnosis Article
That is not to say that there are not
some strange and extraordinary human experiences reported to BUFORA, but that
there are many that can be explained due to a whole range of possibilities and
interpretations.
It is also important to understand
how diverse the UFO subject has become embracing a landscape of many areas of
research, psychology, the paranormal, some scientific disciplines, religion,
folklore and mythology, the human consciousness and the altered state of
consciousness between sleeping and waking and how that ‘altered hallucinatory
state’ can manifest in images and sounds that appear to be very real making us
believe these experiences are actually happening to us. This can all add to the confusion of
interpreting experiences that we sense exist in a different world reality. Our subconscious can sometimes trick us in
how we perceive odd or unusual experiences and so the beat goes on as we step
into this fascinating journey of looking beyond the framework which we know and
understand – BUT we must tread very carefully indeed ensuring that we use
rigorous methods of research to try to identify these experiences as having a
rational explanation.
There are many mysteries and many interpretations of those
mysteries and at the forefront of extraordinary human experiences lies the
human consciousness, and as the British Physicist, Roger Penrose expressed
‘that for all the power and richness of modern science, this knowledge could
not possible account for the ultimate mystery of existence ‘the human consciousness’
For readers’ interest I am
documenting here two recent photographic sightings, where we have received
permission from the witnesses to use their images on our website. BUFORA imaging specialists conduct a lot of
work on behalf of witnesses who have captured visual images on their cameras. As BUFORA
is a voluntary organisation, there is no fee required, but much time is now
taken with these images and therefore on behalf of BUFORA, I would request that
those who send images to us for evaluation consider carefully allowing us to
present these on our website and also for BUFORA to be able to use these images
for purposes of lectures and informing the public of the huge number of objects
that can be photographed and misidentified by the photographer. There is now an
additional directive on the sighting report form when sending in visual images
or footage for evaluation that reads:
The witness
gives permission to BUFORA to use the photographs/footage at our discretion
with respect to keeping the witness anonymous, unless otherwise advised.
The BUFORA Code of Practice will be
strictly adhered to with regard to witness confidentiality at all times.
DONATIONS TO BUFORA
We are always most grateful for
donations to BUFORA because we are a voluntary organisation and conduct a great
deal of work in following up sighting
reports, particularly photographic images and video footage which can take a
considerable amount of the photographic specialists’ time and expertise.
In addition, as a research organisation, we
have several long term projects, including the Vehicle Interference Report,
which is an on-going project and has been compiled by Geoff Falla for over
thirty years working together with Michael Hudson. Projects such as this stand at the cutting
edge of UFO research and contribute to our understanding and exploration of the
many narratives surrounding vehicle interference.
This DVD is available under BUFORA
Products, as are DVDs of BUFORA’s Fiftieth Anniversary in 2012 and also The BUFORA
Journal, a collection of Digital Archives
from 1959-2005
Photograph is copyright to Heather Dixon
Below is a photograph captured near
York, England, UK one evening in August 2013 at about 9pm. The witness noticed lightning and after
fifteen minutes went outside and tried to take a photograph, but as he was not
able to photograph the lighting he put
his camera into video mode which picked up only one sequence which showed
something that appeared like the ‘moon’ and an object with a tail.
These were not visible when he took the photograph.
Photograph is copyright to the photographer
Analysis of the Image by Mark Easen
Thank you for sending your sighting
form and photograph of the two objects captured at night to BUFORA and I would
now like to share my thoughts on it with you.
I notice that you were trying to capture a distant storm and did not see the
two objects through the viewfinder or by eye at the time of taking the
photographs, and that they only appear on one of the shots; also the fact that
the Moon was 90 degrees out of shot would eliminate the Moon as a potential
candidate.
After some consideration, what I believe we have on your photograph is an
explainable phenomenon, similar to an effect we have seen on a few previous
occasions, and is predominantly caused by the camera flash 'bouncing off'
something fairly close up in the shot.
The larger 'orb' like object to the left is surprisingly common and is
definitely caused by flash reflection off something like a water droplet (maybe
a stray one from the storm in the distance?) or even an airborne dust particle.
Because of a camera phone's difficulty focusing on the small point source light
effect generated by this 'back-scatter' effect, the object often appears larger
than it actually is and curiously translucent.
An article explaining this phenomenon can be found here:
The smaller of the two objects in your photograph (the one
on the right with the tail) could have likewise been produced by the flash
reflecting off a similar object to the 'main' object, i.e. water droplet or dust particle as these
sometimes can produce tail like images. However, it does have a different
visual appearance and there does seem to be a sense of motion so perhaps it may
have been the flash reflecting off a small flying insect which was slightly
further back. Therefore it was more in focus with the camera allowing it to
capture its true appearance rather than optically distorting the image as it
did on the 'main' orb like object.
To conclude this evaluation, it is my opinion that the two objects captured on
that one photograph were almost certainly naturally occurring objects (either
rain drop/dust particle or insect) which had been illuminated by the camera
flash and to some degree distorted optically by movement and auto focusing limitations
within the camera.
I do hope this analysis has been of some use to you and that you might be able
to share my thoughts on this once you have digested the information provided?
Thank you once again for contacting us at BUFORA and if there is anything else
at all we might be of assistance with please do not hesitate to contact us
again.
Kind regards
Mark Easen
BUFORA Investigations & Image Analysis
The witness was very happy with Mark’s analysis and responded in
the following way:
Your analysis is very clear
and reasonable and I’m grateful. As you
said, it must be dust particles or insects.
It goes to show just how easily an ordinary event can be misinterpreted
by a lack of knowledge.
A further image taken in Lynton, North Devon several years ago was
emailed to BUFORA recently. This has
also been evaluated by Mark Easen.
This image was captured by a retired Police Officer who was taking
photographs at Lynton overlooking the bay of Lynmouth. In one of the
photographs he noticed a dark blurred line in the cloud that seemed to have
solid mass contained within the cloud and that it appeared that the object may
have been emerging from the cloud.
Photograph is copyright to the photographer
Analysis of the Image by Mark Easen
I have been considering what
the anomalous object might have been and in my opinion I feel it could easily
be a small insect that was flying across fairly close to the camera. At BUFORA
we receive many similar photos to this and so this is a fairly common
phenomenon for us.
I do agree with you that the object does appear to be ‘in the clouds’
somewhat, but I would say that this is actually an optical illusion. In the
1/100th of a second shutter speed the object (if close to the lens)
would have travelled an appreciable angular distance across the frame, and that
is what is causing its long thin and somewhat ‘blurry’ appearance. Also the ‘ends’
of the object would appear to be less solid because of its motion and this then
gives the effect of those ends perhaps ‘going into’ the clouds.
In all probability the focus on your Canon EOS camera would have been set at or
near to infinity in order to photograph the main subject matter (the coastline
and hills in the distance) and that would also mean that a small object close
to the lens would not be in sharp focus. And, further, if the object was a
small flying insect that flew across close to the lens, then that would also
explain why it appeared in one shot and not in another one taken just a second
or so earlier.
I notice you refer to ‘rods’ in your dialogue. There is good evidence to
suggest that these objects are also flying insects, but ones which have been
captured on video. I include a link below which covers this topic in more
detail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_%28optics%29
Perhaps you will agree with the analysis if you view the image a few times with
this explanation in mind?
Thank you once again for contacting BUFORA and if there is anything else we can
be of assistance with please do not hesitate to contact us again.
Kind regards
Mark Easen
Investigations and image analyst
BUFORA
www.bufora.org.uk
The witness agreed with Mark’s
analysis with the following comments:
Thank
you for your reply. I certainly agree with your findings and I am pleased that
I now have a credible explanation for this curious aberration in the
photograph, not helped by the optical illusion of it being contained within the
cloud.
Thank
you for your time and effort in examining the photograph and the conclusion you
reached.
Photograph is copyright to Heather Dixon
To
conclude this article, I would like to extend many thanks to everyone who
contacts BUFORA with their sightings, photographs and footage and also for
sharing your more unusual and personal experiences. By doing this, over fifty years on, BUFORA
continues to have a more in-depth understanding of the complexities of the
subject and, more critically, a clearer and more focused lens looking into the
‘human face’ of ufology and how our beliefs and perceptions can dramatically
influence the way in which we report a sighting or a high strangeness
experience.
Gloria
Heather Dixon (July 2015)
|
|
|